Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

Accounting Policies

v3.8.0.1
Accounting Policies
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2017
Accounting Policies  
Accounting Policies

2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Financial Statement Presentation.  The condensed consolidated financial statements have been developed in conformity with GAAP, which requires management to make estimates and assumptions.  These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.  All intercompany transactions between TopBuild entities have been eliminated.  Certain reclassifications have been made in the 2016 condensed consolidated financial statements to conform to the 2017 classifications with no impact on previously reported net income or equity.

 

Business Combinations.  The purchase price for business combinations is allocated to the estimated fair values of acquired tangible and intangible assets, including goodwill, and assumed liabilities, where applicable.  Additionally, we recognize customer relationships, trademarks and trade names, and non-competition agreements as identifiable intangible assets.  These assets are recorded at fair value as of the transaction date.  The fair value of these intangible assets is determined primarily using the income approach and using current industry information.  Goodwill is recorded when consideration transferred exceeds the fair value of identifiable assets and liabilities.  Measurement-period adjustments are recorded in the period they occur.  Contingent consideration is recorded at fair value at the acquisition date.

 

Share-based Compensation.  Our share-based compensation program currently consists of RSAs and Options.  Share-based compensation expense is reported in selling, general, and administrative expense.  We do not capitalize any compensation cost related to share-based compensation awards.  The income tax benefits and deficiencies associated with share-based awards are reported as a component of income tax expense.  Excess tax benefits and deficiencies are included in cash provided by (used in) operating activities while shares withheld for tax-withholding are reported in financing activities under the caption “Taxes withheld and paid on employees’ equity awards” in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.  Award forfeitures are accounted for in the period they occur. 

 

The following table details our award types and accounting policies:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Award Type:

Fair Value Determination

Vesting

Expense
Recognition‡

Expense
Measurement

Restricted Share Awards

 

 

 

 

Service Condition

Closing stock price on date of grant

Ratably;
3 or 5 years

Straight-line

Fair value at grant date

Performance Condition

Closing stock price on date of grant

Cliff;
3 years

Straight-line;
Adjusted based on meeting or exceeding performance targets

Evaluated quarterly;
0 - 200% of fair value at grant date depending on performance

Market Condition

Monte-Carlo Simulation

Cliff;
3 years

Straight-line;
Recognized even if condition is not met

Fair value at grant date

Stock Options†

Black-Scholes Options Pricing Model

Ratably;
3 or 5 years

Straight-line

Fair value at grant date


†Stock options expire no later than 10 years after the grant date.

‡Expense is reversed if award is forfeited prior to vesting.

 

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements:

 

In July 2015 the FASB issued ASU 2015-11 “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory.”  Under this guidance, inventory should be measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value.  Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation.  We adopted this guidance in the beginning of the first quarter of 2017.  The adoption of this amendment did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted:

 

In May 2014 the FASB issued a new standard for revenue recognition, ASC 606.  Subsequent to issuing ASC 606, the FASB issued a number of updates and technical improvements which do not change the core principles of the guidance.  The purpose of ASC 606 is to provide a single, comprehensive revenue recognition model for all contracts with customers to improve comparability across industries.  ASC 606 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2018, and allows for full retrospective or modified retrospective methods of adoption; early adoption is permitted.  In determining the applicability of ASC 606, we considered the general nature of our orders is short-term, based on a single deliverable, and not accounted for under industry-specific guidance.  We reviewed our revenue streams at both our Installation and Distribution segments.  Our current assessment indicates that the adoption of the standard will likely not have a material impact on the amount or timing of our revenue recognition process.  Additional disclosures related to our revenues, contract balances, and judgments affecting recognition will be required.  We plan to apply the modified retrospective approach to transition to the new guidance, which would allow us to recognize the cumulative effect of initially applying the standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings.  We do not plan to early adopt the standard.  We will continue to evaluate additional changes, modifications, clarifications, or interpretations issued by the FASB, which may impact our current conclusions.

 

In February 2016 the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases.”  This standard requires a lessee to recognize most leases on its balance sheet.  Companies are required to use a modified retrospective transition method for all existing leases.  This standard is effective for us beginning January 1, 2019.  Early adoption is permitted.  We have not yet selected an adoption date and we are currently evaluating the effect on our financial position and results of operations.

 

In June 2016 the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses.”  This guidance introduces a current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model for the recognition of impairment losses on financial assets, including trade receivables.  The CECL model replaces current GAAP’s incurred loss model.  Under CECL, companies will record an allowance through current earnings for the expected credit loss for the life of the financial asset upon initial recognition of the financial asset.  This update is effective for us at the beginning of 2020 with early adoption permitted at the beginning of 2019.  We have not yet selected an adoption date and we are currently evaluating the effect on our financial position and results of operations.

 

In January 2017 the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, “Clarifying the Definition of a Business.  The new standard narrows the definition of a business and provides a framework for evaluation.  This update is effective for us beginning January 1, 2018 and will be applied prospectively.  We do not expect this update to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

 

In January 2017 the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.”  The new standard simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating the second step of the good will impairment test.  This update is effective for us beginning January 1, 2020.  Early adoption is permitted and the new standard will be applied on a prospective basis.  We have not yet selected an adoption date and we are currently evaluating the effect on our financial position and results of operations.